Category: Power

Each year, as we observe Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we do more than simply remember a man; we honor a philosophy of transformation that remains the most viable blueprint for social progress. In our current era, where tensions between government agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and immigrant rights protesters often reach a boiling point, King’s legacy offers a critical middle path. His life taught us that the pursuit of justice is most powerful when it is conducted with a disciplined commitment to peaceful assembly and a profound, mutual respect between the citizen and the state.

The Case for Global Oversight: Why the UN Needs the Power to “Police the Police”

The fundamental duty of any police force is to protect and serve the citizenry. However, across the globe, we increasingly witness a disturbing inversion of this role. From the aggressive tactics of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the United States to the systemic suppression of dissent by police in Russia, Iran, and China, law enforcement has frequently become an instrument of state-sponsored abuse rather than a guardian of public safety. Because these abuses often stem from the highest levels of national government, domestic accountability mechanisms are frequently compromised or non-existent. To protect universal human rights, the United Nations must be granted expanded authority to monitor national police forces, supported by an independent body with the mandate to “police the police.”

The Greenland Summit: A Failed Dialogue and a Missing Arbiter

The high-stakes meeting at the White House on January 14, 2026, between representatives from Denmark, Greenland, and the United States, was ostensibly designed to de-escalate what has become a defining geopolitical crisis of the mid-2020s. Instead, the sit-down—hosted by Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio—underscored a chilling reality: the international order is currently a theater of “might makes right,” where the sovereignty of smaller nations is treated as a line item in a real estate ledger.

President Trump’s relentless pursuit of Greenland, framed as a “national security necessity” to preempt Russian and Chinese influence, has pushed a NATO ally to the brink. While the meeting resulted in the formation of a “working group,” the fundamental disagreement remains: Washington insists on acquisition, while Copenhagen and Nuuk insist on the inviolability of borders. Yet, in this room filled with diplomats and security hawks, there was one glaring, inexcusable absence: the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

The question of Greenland’s sovereignty has emerged as a critical flashpoint in international relations. As of early 2026, renewed pressure from the United States to acquire the territory—ranging from economic threats to the refusal to rule out military force—has created a diplomatic crisis within NATO and the United Nations.

To uphold the core principles of the UN Charter, the international community must take two decisive steps: first, a formal condemnation of any attempt by a foreign power to unilaterally annex or purchase Greenland; and second, a recommendation for Greenland’s full independence to finalize its long-standing journey toward self-determination.

The Iranian Crisis: A Mandate for Multilateral Action

The dawn of 2026 has found Iran at a critical crossroads. Since late December 2025, a wave of civil and political unrest has swept through all 31 provinces, ignited by a collapsing economy and record inflation, but rapidly evolving into a fundamental challenge to the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic. As security forces—including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)—deploy lethal force, the international community faces a familiar dilemma. However, the historical record suggests that the solution does not lie in the unilateral intervention of the United States. Instead, the current crisis presents a unique and necessary opportunity for the United Nations to assert its authority, enforce its Charter, and facilitate a transition from an autocratic theocracy to a productive, democratic socialist society.